Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Nhan đề:||Validation of verbal autopsy methods using hospital medical records: a case study in Vietnam.|
|Tác giả:||Hong, Tran Thi|
Phuong, Nguyen Hoa
Walker, Sue M.
Hill, Peter S.
|Từ khoá:||Validation of verbal autopsy|
Causes of death
|Năm xuất bản:||2018|
|Tùng thư/Số báo cáo:||BMC Med Res Methodol;pp. 1 - 10|
|Tóm tắt:||BACKGROUND: Information on causes of death (COD) is crucial for measuring the health outcomes of populations and progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. In many countries such as Vietnam where the civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) system is dysfunctional, information on vital events will continue to rely on verbal autopsy (VA) methods. This study assesses the validity of VA methods used in Vietnam, and provides recommendations on methods for implementing VA validation studies in Vietnam. METHODS: This validation study was conducted on a sample of 670 deaths from a recent VA study in Quang Ninh province. The study covered 116 cases from this sample, which met three inclusion criteria: a) the death occurred within 30 days of discharge after last hospitalisation, and b) medical records (MRs) for the deceased were available from respective hospitals, and c) the medical record mentioned that the patient was terminally ill at discharge. For each death, the underlying cause of death (UCOD) identified from MRs was compared to the UCOD from VA. The validity of VA diagnoses for major causes of death was measured using sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). RESULTS: The sensitivity of VA was at least 75% in identifying some leading CODs such as stroke, road traffic accidents and several site-specific cancers. However, sensitivity was less than 50% for other important causes including ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and diabetes. Overall, there was 57% agreement between UCOD from VA and MR, which increased to 76% when multiple causes from VA were compared to UCOD from MR. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that VA is a valid method to ascertain UCOD in contexts such as Vietnam. Furthermore, within cultural contexts in which patients prefer to die at home instead of a healthcare facility, using the available MRs as the gold standard may be meaningful to the extent that recall bias from the interval between last hospital discharge and death can be minimized. Therefore, future studies should evaluate validity of MRs as a gold standard for VA studies in contexts similar to the Vietnamese context.|
|Appears in Collections:||Health care|
Files in This Item:
|Validation of verbal autopsy methods.pdf||2,01 MB|| Download|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.